This pretty interesting study from Avalere Health confirms what several others have shown. If you add a user fee to any medical procedure people use less of it. And of course their decision to use it less is not based on whether it’s medically necessary or not; it’s based on how much it costs and what their income is. The difference with this study is that it’s about the use of expensive cancer drugs which are increasingly oral, now that oncologists aren’t being rewarded as much for delivering them via infusion. Co-pays of $500 or more saw “abandonment” rates of 25% or more. Other factors creating increased rates of abandonment included lower income (duh) and whether the patient was covered by Medicare or commercial insurance. The study was (of course) funded by a gaggle of drug companies. They didn’t fund the (non-existent) parallel study of which of these drugs actually did the cancer patients any good, but it’s not logical that cost should be the determinant of whether a drug–especially presumably a life-saving one–gets used.
Categories: Matthew Holt
In its busiest year, the terminal only handled about 600 passengers per day which was a small number in New
York. Yuyuan Garden, located in Anren Jie, Shanghai is a famous classical garden of the Ming Dynasty
(1368-1644). A smaller replica of the Statue
of Liberty is placed in the village Visnes where the copper was mined to make the original statue.
Another parallel study that would have been good is to have followed those who abandoned cancer therapies and compare them with those who adhered to cancer therapy. That could provide a clue about which therapies were effective and the degree to which patients were harmed by their actions.
Quelle surprise!