data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d844/8d8445ff9f4a6e1f137fca00d4e8c5bfa6525b55" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ff53/5ff53537d14d589f8d4b08980f9542c3f888bb73" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c560/9c560ff18f124d1754c08685d0d9b2ca45dfe1f9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dffe/2dffeda94c2d97b3ff320b8c7bdacd6277c29776" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3532d/3532d07aecf7997a4dda2406cde0c4fd7a51686b" alt=""
By POOJA RAO, TARUN RAJ, BHARGAVA REDDY, MANOJ TLD, and PREETHAM SRINIVAS
In March 2020, we re-purposed our chest X-ray AI tool, qXR, to detect signs of COVID-19. We validated it on a test set of 11479 CXRs with 515 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 positives. The algorithm performs at an AUC of 0.9 (95% CI : 0.88 – 0.92) on this test set. At our most common operating threshold for this version, sensitivity is 0.912 (95% CI : 0.88 – 0.93) and specificity is 0.775 (95% CI : 0.77 – 0.78). qXR for COVID-19 is used at over 28 sites across the world to triage suspected patients with COVID-19 and to monitor the progress of infection in patients admitted to hospital
The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has already caused a great deal of disruption around the world. Healthcare systems are overwhelmed as we speak, in the face of WHO guidance to ‘test, test, test’ [1]. Many countries are facing a severe shortage of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) tests. There has been a lot of debate around the role of radiology — both chest X-rays (CXRs) and chest CT scans — as an alternative or supplement to RT-PCR in triage and diagnosis. Opinions on the subject range from ‘Radiology is fundamental in this process’ [2] to ‘framing CT as pivotal for COVID-19 diagnosis is a distraction during a pandemic, and possibly dangerous’ [3].
Continue reading…