ST. LOUIS — Melody Ping never thought she would be trying to moveout of a nursing home. She lived in a St. Louis apartment for 19 years and worked as an
accountant until two years ago, when she lost her job. Ping, who has
multiple sclerosis, couldn't find new work. When her unemployment ran
out, she ended up on Medicaid in a nursing home.
Ping, 51, is among tens of thousands of people nationwide who want to
live on their own, but instead remain in nursing homes, rehab centers
or state hospitals, often at a higher cost to taxpayers because of a
historic bias toward institutional care.
Ten years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court said that
bias amounted to discrimination. Now, as disability advocates
celebrate the anniversary of that landmark ruling, they worry the Obama
administration is backing away from a pledge to give more people with
disabilities the option to live at home.
As a senator, Barack Obama co-sponsored the
Community Choice Act, pending legislation that would give
Medicaid recipients equal access to services in the community and not
force them into institutions. But the administration recently said it would
not address the issue as part of its proposed health care
overhaul.
Disability rights advocates were so angered that at least 90 were
arrested during an April protest outside the White House. For some, the
dispute was a blunt reminder of how hard it has been to put an end to
discrimination even with affirmation from the Supreme Court.
"I don't think most policymakers see it as a civil rights issue," said
Andrew Imparato, president of the American Association of People with
Disabilities. "I don't think most people see the ability of
getting out of bed and dressing in your own home as a civil right."
A spokesman said President Obama continues to support efforts to help people with disabilities move out of nursing homes.
About one in five nursing home residents responding to a survey by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services indicated they would prefer
to live in their communities. That translates to 270,000 of the
nation's 1.35 million nursing home residents.
Demand for community services is likely to mushroom in coming decades.
Improvements in medical technology help more people survive serious
injuries, but often with a disability. Baby boomers entering their
retirement years are demanding alternatives to nursing homes.
"If you can't hear the thunderstorm coming, you're not listening," said
disability advocate Mark Johnson of Atlanta. Living at home "is what
people would want for themselves and their families."
Thousands Waiting
That was the motive for the Olmstead case — named for defendant Tommy
Olmstead, Georgia's human services commissioner when the case was
brought by two mentally disabled women, Elaine Wilson and Lois Curtis.
They said they were segregated unnecessarily in a state hospital, and
that with proper support, they could live at home.
The Supreme Court ruled
that funding services for Medicaid recipients only in institutions
violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The decision touched off a wave of hope. The U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services recommended that state Medicaid directors draft
plans for helping people who wanted to move out of institutions.
Twenty-nine states produced plans, but few resulted in actual changes.
Many are now out of date.
Nationally in 2007, more than 331,000 people were on waiting lists for
community services. About two-thirds have developmental disabilities,
and the rest have other disabilities or are elderly.
In Missouri, where about 48,000 people live in institutions, including
nursing homes, about 45 percent of the state's Medicaid long-term
spending goes to home services. About 4,000 people are on a waiting
list for community services — most are developmentally disabled
people, some who do not live in institutions.
In Illinois, which has at least 97,000 people in nursing homes and
other institutions, about 30 percent of Medicaid long-term spending
goes to community services. Disability activists in that state worry
that the current budget shortfall may force more people into
institutions.
Disability advocates blame the slow progress on opposition from the
multibillion-dollar nursing home industry and from unions that
represent state institution workers. Also, many states have been
unwilling to alter budget structures that favor institutions.
The American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees has declined requests
by disability groups to endorse the Community Choice Act, which it
worries could cost the union's members jobs.
The American
Health Care Association has never taken an official position
on the act, said Susan Feeney, a spokeswoman for the organization
representing the nursing home industry. "We do support the ability for
individuals with disabilities to receive the care they need in the most
integrated setting."
But industry groups have opposed measures to make community services
mandatory, saying they could jeopardize funding for people who need
nursing home services.
"It's difficult to bring about a cultural change," said Stephen Gold, a
Philadelphia lawyer who has handled dozens of lawsuits for people
seeking to move out of institutions. "It's like a big ship, and we're
slowly turning it."
More than 140 lawsuits have been brought across the country. While many
led to individuals leaving institutions, they haven't always changed
state Medicaid programs.
Missouri was among the first states to allow Medicaid funding to follow
a resident who leaves a nursing home. Federal grants and pilot efforts
have encouraged similar policies.
Two obstacles tend to stand in the way of people like Ping: They cannot
get or find the services they would need at home, such as an attendant
to help them get out of bed, dress or bathe. And they cannot find
affordable, accessible housing, which is in short supply.
In St. Louis, the waiting list for low-income housing vouchers is
"closed indefinitely." And housing options in other Missouri cities can
be hard to come by.
Peter Lloyd of St. Charles knows how much harder it is to move out of a
nursing home than into one. He landed there after being hospitalized by
an infection and spent more than a year arranging for services so he
could move to his own apartment.
"I needed to be around younger people in the same situation," said the
44-year-old Lloyd, who has cerebral palsy. "None of the activities are
geared for people my age. How many times a week can you play bingo?"
After months of paperwork and phone calls, he got an apartment through
the St. Charles County Housing Authority. He also got funding for an
aide to help him wash, dress and cook.
Seven years later, Lloyd is really on his own. He no longer needs a
personal attendant. He drives a van, adapted for his power scooter, to
St. Charles Community College, where he is pursuing a degree in
English. On the weekends, Lloyd drives to Chesterfield, where he works
for a computer help desk.
But the chances of making a transition like Lloyd's vary widely from state to state.
In Tennessee, only 1 percent of Medicaid long-term funds for disabled
and elderly adults went to community services in 2007. By contrast,
Arizona spends 64 percent of Medicaid long-term care money on community
services.
Debating Costs
Disability advocates argue that real progress won't come until more is
done to keep people at home. They have pinned their hopes on the Community
Choice Act.
Similar bills have come before Congress for at least a decade. As a senator, Obama cosponsored the bill in 2007.
But for now, long-term care is not part of his health care reforms.
White House officials cited cost as the reason in a meeting with
disability advocates in April.
Obama's staff wouldn't say what his current position is on making
community programs mandatory. The White House Web site had said Obama
would support the Community Choice Act. Recently, the site
was changed to say he would "build on existing efforts to
encourage states to shift more of their services away from
institutions."
Disability advocates say that letting more people have services at home
will save money, one of Obama's goals in health care reform.
The average annual cost of a nursing home nationally is about $75,000,
according to a recent study by AARP. Community services that allow
people to remain at home are about $23,000 a year, according to an
analysis of Medicaid data by the Center for Personal Assistance
Services at the University of California, San Francisco.
Critics warn that even if costs are lower in individual cases, overall
costs will rise because more people with disabilities will request
services if they are available.
In Texas, where 18,000 people have moved from nursing homes since 2001,
officials say they have seen the savings firsthand. "It certainly does
not cost more," said Marc Gold, a state official who directs the Texas
Promoting Independence Program.
Chris Hilderbrant, of the Center
for Disability Rights, said Obama and congressional leaders
are missing an opportunity to fix a long-standing injustice. Once
again, people with disabilities are left on the sidelines, he said.
"We're going to get to you later," Hilderbrant said, "means we're going
to get to you never."
In St. Louis, Melody Ping is still waiting in a nursing home, longing
for a return to apartment life, where she likely will need an attendant
to help her.
"I'm used to making my own choices," Ping said. "Here, they tell you when to get up and when to eat."
Categories: Uncategorized
In Florida, there is a program called “Nursing Home Diversion”. It allows people who don’t need to be in nursing homes to move to a less institutional setting like a Get your HTML codes here! facility. It saves the state a lot of money. The problem i find is that most residents in assisted living are elderly which makes it difficult for younger adults.
It seems that the answer is to find a skilled nursing facility that provides specialized health care for the type of disability that the patient has.
Great blog, it was a great help.
Thanks for putting this blog up. We know there are millions out there that want to remain independent, but some still need help with their health care.
Nursing Services currently have approximately 2,500 Nursing and Non-Nursing positions comprising personnel from over 44 different nationality bases. This national diversity reflects the diversity in culture and clinical skills within Nursing Services. To learn more about please enter her
Blog is interesting and motivated me a lot!! thanks
Thanks for putting this blog up. We know there are millions out there that want to remain independent, but some still need help with their health care.
We can really sympathize with Melody’s situation; and know from personal experience how many boomers want to remain independent too, (my Dad is the perfect example).
We always hear how hard it is for people to manage their medication or how difficult it is for families to provide long-distance care.
We are living in a new innovative era though, and there is still light at the end of this tunnel.
Before decisions are made to use nursing homes, people should consider other options to help individuals and improve care giving.
What if there was something out there that helped people take control of their health, or the health care of someone they loved?
Individuals could receive reminders on their phone via text or email to take their medications, to remember their doctor appointments, or to even re-fill their medications.
Maybe they could create a private care community online and invite family members, friends or caregivers to access their calendars or contact information; (Of course privilege levels would be set with each invitation sent to the user’s private care community)
It would also be great if individuals could track their health and wellness with a journal and other helpful charts.
Maybe other members in the care community could make entries too and individuals could see the progress of their blood pressure, blood glucose levels, or weight, for example.
Wouldn’t it be great if there was something like that for people to use before they turn to nursing homes? Well… there is, RememberItNow! has created all this online to help families like Melody’s or even like mine that can help individuals remain independent.
RememberItNow! has so much more to offer and was founded on hope to make a difference. Feel free to email me about questions or my experience at:
abettencourt@rememberitnow.com
Blog is really informative and entertainng same time.
thanks you
thanks you
I work at an agency that provides community supported living in Seattle. I don’t think it is any secret that the cost per year for community based living vs. institutionalization is much more affordable in the long run and allows for personal choice and freedom of the individual. Many of the people in our homes have jobs and pay taxes and are active members of their community. I don’t know that institutions can say the same thing. I won’t even go into the abominable care some of our clients receive when they are taken to nursing homes for medical reasons.
From what I have seen, the disability community is a tough one to rally behind one banner, too many people going too many different directions that it can be difficult to make meaningful change, add to that the dismissive attitude of lawmakers and, well, you have a system that is broken and bleeding money.
However, the point in this article I want to applaud, which I had never really considered before: the boomer generation is NOT going to want institutionalized care as they age. My parents are in the boomer generation and I can tell you right now I will do anything in my power to avoid having them placed in a nursing home because of the stories I could tell about our clients’ experiences. This is a great point to rally more than just the disability community – besides the institutions’ lobbys and unions, what boomer or child of a boomer would pass this off as an unimportant issue?
After the Carlyle Group buyout of ManorCare Health Services, continued dispicable nursing home care, an uncaring oversight agency (Pennsylvania Department of Health), an unsolicited phone call from CMS in Baltimore, strongly encouraging me to remove her from ManorCare for her health and safety, the Sping Township Police Chief gladly assisted me in securing my mother’s safe removal from the home in March of this year. A federal complaint inspection found their infection rate twice to four times the national CMS average.
Now I’m the sole unpaid caregiver for my mother (again), now age 94. There are millions of us home caregivers who do this without any support at all. I too heard that as Senator, Barack Obama co-sponsored legislation that would give Medicaid recipients equal access to services in the community and not force them into institutions. And to find out that the administration would not address the issue as part of its proposed health care overhaul, is distressing.
I was searching for some ray of hope in the Obama health care reform package to assist family caregivers, and found deep holes in support. The regulatory enforcement system for nursing homes has a lot of problems, putting residents at risk. I know the state’s health department IS the problem, but CMS may be part of the problem too!
The Coalition to Protect Senior Care (CPSC) said it is mobilizing to defeat a Medicare regulation put forward for implementation by CMS which would cut Medicare funding by $1.05 billion in FY 2010 and $5.6 billion over five years, eliminate key front line care jobs that make a positive difference in patient outcomes, and significantly undercut ongoing improvments in clinical infrastructure already underway now benefitting patients.
A spokesperson for the National Association of Health Care Assistants said that with so many good health care reform ideas coming from the Obama Administration, it is curious and distressing to see previously-discredited Medicare regulation appear on the policy radar screen. Its net impact will be to reverse existing federal policy that is currently benefitting elderly patients.
In the past few years, a wave of new owners and investors have purchsed nursing home chains. These private-equity firms are unregulated and new to the nursing home market. The top priority for these new owners are profits, rather than providing the staffing and resources necessary to ensure top quality care for our loved ones.
The nursing home sector accounts for roughly 6 percent, or $124.9 billion of the more than $2 trillion that we invest annually in healthcare. The question is “are we getting any value for our money?”
Nursing home care falling short
http://talk.baltimoresun.com/showthread.php?t=147677